What we publish

Pieces that could only have been written by someone who has actually done the thing. First-hand accounts of running an affiliate program and what changed when terms moved. Analysis backed by data you collected. A specific, contrarian argument you can defend. Deep technical guidance on attribution, tracking or program operations.

What we decline

  • Listicles assembled from other people's listicles
  • AI-generated content with no original insight or first-hand experience
  • Pieces whose actual purpose is a backlink
  • Anything with commission figures we cannot verify against a primary source
  • General affiliate marketing content with no SaaS specificity
  • Thinly disguised product marketing

Standards

Accepted pieces are edited and held to the same factual standards as our own writing. Any commission figure, cookie duration or program status must be verifiable against a primary source, and we will check. Claims about your own results need to be things you are prepared to stand behind publicly.

Pieces are attributed to you with a byline and a link to your site. Editorial links within the body are our decision based on what helps the reader, and they are not part of the arrangement — see the editorial policy.

Practicalities

  • Pitch first, do not send a finished draft
  • Aim for 1,200–2,500 words once commissioned
  • Original to this site — not syndicated or republished elsewhere
  • We may request revisions, and we may decline after seeing a draft
  • Contributions are unpaid; this is not a content-mill arrangement in either direction

Pitch an idea